1 house in 9 is nobody’s home.

Rappahannock is being converted from a place people live into a place people visit — quietly, one BOS approved policy at a time.

This county has well over a hundred houses registered as tourist homes — the county’s term for an unhosted rental with no resident manager. We didn’t vote for this. There was no plan and no debate. It happened at ordinary meetings, one special exception at a time, and the county has never added up the result.

We are making a new proposal to end new approvals of absentee, investor-owned rentals countywide, and to let working farms host guests under strict and farmer-friendly new rules. The county already bars anyone who has owned a property less than two years from applying for a tourist home. We are proposing to finish that thought.

We are Justin and Emily Lock. We farm in Woodville and we want to host guests here, so read this knowing we have a stake in it. We think the trade is right: stop investor rentals from hollowing out our community in favor of real working farms.

  • U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2020–2024 5-year, table B25004. Census estimate of 422 units of 3,865, or roughly one in nine; margin of error ±179, a true range of 243 to 601. Even at the low end of that range, roughly one in sixteen housing units.

Draft of August 14, 2026Proposed by Justin & Emily Lock, Yancey Farm, WoodvilleNot a county document

A slow bleed, not a boom

Short-term rentals here are not exploding. That is the part that makes it hard to see. A house becomes an investor rental at one hearing, and it does not come back. There is no mechanism in the county code that returns a rental to the housing supply, and no reason an owner would. Each approval is small. The total is well over a hundred houses, and there is no rental market left.

The county has no count. Applications are posted case by case, usually the week before the hearing. No department publishes a running total, no annual report tracks it, and no supervisor has asked for one.

In the meantime, the average Rappahannock wage is $49,140 and the income needed for a median-priced home in this region is $175,400.

  • Rappahannock County short-term rental registration, Rappahannock Code § 151-84
  • Hearing materials are posted case by case through BoardDocs, generally the week before a hearing
  • Greater Piedmont Region Housing Gap Analysis, Greater Piedmont REALTORS, 2026

Why you should be suspicious of us

We want to host guests on our farm. We asked the county whether we could, the county declined to answer, and we are in circuit court about it. That is the reason this page exists.

What we are proposing would close a door for hundreds of properties, including some worth more than ours, and open a narrow one for farms that meet seven tests designed to establish if the property is a real farm, or an investment from outside the county. If we wanted the easy version, we would have applied for a tourist home like everyone else. That door is open. We are asking the county to shut it.

Our farms are not being protected by the county’s own policies

The rural character the county says it protects is not a view. It is roughly four hundred businesses, most of them losing money, most of them one bad year from selling to someone who will not farm it.

Spring 2026 brought several late hard freezes across the region. Apples, peaches, apricots, wine grapes. A farm with no other income takes that year at zero.

Some 1,400 Virginia farms host visitors, accounting for $2.2 billion in activity and 22,151 jobs. Virginia Cooperative Extension’s 2025 Rappahannock analysis recommends exactly this kind of enterprise.

What it stops

That is the closed lane. Here is the narrow one.

What we are proposing

Two lanes. A working farm gets a narrow, capped, conservation-bound permission. Everyone else gets a closed door. A resident renting the home they live in is protected either way.

Every item must be true

This is the part that keeps investors out. Read it as a filter, not a permission.

Outside the checklist, the Zoning Administrator reviews case by case. Any finding of substantial impact must be written, fact-specific, and state on its face the right to appeal, when the 30-day clock starts, the fee, and where to file.

Built to conserve, including the night sky

Rappahannock County Park has been an International Dark Sky Park since March 2019, in one of the darkest remaining corners of the eastern United States.

The proposal makes that binding. All guest and event lighting fully shielded, downward-directed, warm at 3000K or below, and off or minimal by 11 p.m. Tents and event areas out of stream buffers and floodplains. No clearing of mature forest.

The Rappahannock League for Environmental Protection exists to conserve the natural resources and rural character of this county, and lists farms, wildlife and dark skies among its priorities. A tourist home approved next door carries none of these conditions. Conservation gets protections here that the current approach does not offer.

What it would not do

We would not be first

Counties around us already make room for this

All citations independently verified in August 2026.

The fine print

The actual legal text

The complete draft, in the county’s own format, as it would be laid before the Board of Supervisors.

Section numbers, use-chart columns and statutory quotations checked against the live county code and against law.lis.virginia.gov on August 14, 2026.

This is the county-format draft of August 14, 2026. Two cross-references still need conforming to the county’s printed chapter before it is filed: the paragraph numbering of § 170-66.K, and the buffer terminology used by the Stream Protection Overlay. The drafter’s working notes and the adoption certificate are not reproduced here. Tell us where it is wrong.

Reservation of position

What state law already says

Va. Code § 15.2-2288.6 bars special-permit requirements for agritourism on farmland absent substantial public impact, and the Attorney General concluded in 2023 that farm lodging offered with rural activities can qualify (Op. 22-036). In 2024, § 15.2-983(D) drew a second line: no new ordinance may require a special exception for renting your own primary residence, while counties keep full power over everything else, including ending a lodging use. This proposal writes both lines into county code.

Where this stands

From proposal to law

Property owners may petition for zoning amendments. Only the county can adopt one, after an advertised public hearing.

Your turn

Tell us where we are wrong

This draft is meant to be improved by the people who will live with it. Concerns count as much as support.

Share your thoughts with the Locks

Comments go to Justin & Emily Lock and may be shared with the county as part of the public record.